![]() However, when we tested with Speedmark 6.5, our application-based benchmark suite, the results showed little or no benefit with OWC’s drive. All other results as megabytes per second higher is better. Startup results are in seconds lower is better. We also saw up to 47 percent faster average read speeds and 32 percent faster average write speeds using the Fill Disk tests on diglloydTools’ DiskTester. With the AJA System Test, which is used to see how well your system would perform with the AJA hardware working with HD video in real time, we found impressive speed improvements, with the Mercury Aura Pro Express posting 13 percent faster write speeds and 26 percent faster read speeds than the MacBook Air’s stock 64GB flash storage. In order to see such a vast a difference between the MacBook Air’s flash storage and the Mercury Aura Pro Express, we had to use automated tests that task the MacBook Air in ways that most people wouldn’t use an ultra-portable. ![]() The marketing materials for the Mercury Aura Pro Express claim that the drives offer up to 68 percent faster performance than the stock flash storage. Once the storage upgrade was installed, we found the added capacity to be a blessing, but our performance results were unexpectedly mixed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |